Nick and I were talking about this article/post we saw recently about a silly lawsuit over a kitty litter commercial.
Nick thinks this is a positive for The Clorox Co. because the plaintiff (Arm & Hammer) looks silly “Cats do not talk.” Really?
I understand why he might see this as positive publicity for Clorox, but I disagree. In my experience with retail, the old adage “there’s no such thing as bad publicity” does not always ring true; particularly in the mind of the client, there absolutely IS bad publicity.
In the fierce world of retail, a lawsuit like this could be seen as simply that, A LAWSUIT. What AE wants to hear “Your ad campaign got me sued?” Even if the plaintiff is grasping at straws and the suit is frivolous, it’s still a lawsuit. Many retail clients might think a lawsuit over a marketing message could deter other consumers from shopping their stores. And in retail, there is nothing worse than reduced foot traffic and reduced sales!
What do you think? Is a lawsuit like this a good thing or bad thing?
Who Influenced the Influencers?
In advertising, pretty much everyone has been influenced by someone else. As we’ve been bringing you stories about ad legends like Bill Bernbach and George
July 19, 2023
