Close this search box.
Close this search box.

Can LIVESTRONG break the cycle?

Share This Post

Recently, the LIVESTRONG Foundation – formerly known as the Lance Armstrong Foundation – unveiled a new logo to create distance between the disgraced cyclist and the nonprofit organization dedicated to helping those living with cancer.
LIVESTRONG Foundation Exec VP-Operations Andy Miller explained the new look like this: “The change is subtle, but it is substantive. The positioning of the bars suggests forward and dynamic movement.”
You can certainly make an argument that, from a design standpoint, this is a natural step in the mark’s evolution. But is it enough to accomplish the Foundation’s main goal?
At first glance, it’s hard to ignore that the brand tied so closely with Lance Armstrong for past 9 nine years has decided to move forward using the same bright yellow color he made famous worldwide.
Even more perplexing is the fact that the Foundation has chosen to continue bolding the STRONG portion of their name.
I understand that the LIVESTRONG name and color are highly recognizable, which is critically important with so many nonprofits and charitable organizations competing for the same dollar. And the addition of the word Foundation to the outward facing name does help to take the focus off a single person.
But wouldn’t it have made more sense – and immediately signaled a change in direction – to bold LIVE instead of STRONG? Isn’t living with cancer what the foundation is all about, anyway? Or, if that’s too dramatic of a change, they could have just treated the entire name the same without bolding anything at all.
Also, would anyone have blamed the LIVESTRONG Foundation for adopting a different color than that same bright yellow? Even a simple change in the shade of yellow would have helped to convey that the Foundation had evolved.
It may be impossible to ever fully separate the nonprofit’s name with the person who has been synonymous with it for nearly a decade. But these initial actions by the LIVESTRONG Foundation do little to help people see the organization as an independent entity that has moved on from Lance Armstrong.

More To Explore

Current360 2024 Predictions crystal ball

2024 Predictions

Thanks to everyone who responded to our 2024 Predictions survey last month. While the sample size wasn’t quite the size of a Pew or Nielsen,

Tradition and digital media crown become digital

The King is dead.
Long Live the King.

No we’re not talking about Charles VII or his father Charles VI. Instead, we’re recognizing the passing of the baton after years of shifts from

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

I am not a robot
Ed Sharp Current360 headshot

Ed Sharp

Ed brings 15 years of traditional and digital media sales experience to the agency, giving us a perspective most agencies don’t have. When he’s not working or seeking new knowledge, Ed hangs out with his wife, two kids, two dogs, one cat, and a hamster. And yes, the cat and hamster are best friends.

Chaney Given

Chaney is a talented and accomplished designer and illustrator, who has expanded his skill set to include motion graphics and video editing. With nearly a decade of experience, his client work includes Waterstep, Baptist Health, the Archdiocese of Louisville Catholic Schools, First Harrison Bank, and many more